Featured

If you ever played Papyrus’ seminal Grand Prix Legends then you’ve read his name. Rich began working as a tester on NASCAR Racing (1994) and was with Papyrus at the end. In this interview, published in 2022, we discuss his time at the legendary studio and the design of Grand Prix Legends, including initial feelings of hurt at not being asked to join iRacing.

As a direct ancestor of iRacing, the ‘Grand Prix Legends engine’ had multiple stock car racing false starts, before eventually releasing as NASCAR Racing 4. The original NASCAR 3, cancelled and replaced by one that used NASCAR 2’s engine, is barely remembered.

 

Share This Page

Facebook Twitter Reddit

Support RSC

Please support us by not blocking ads on our domain. We have disabled Google Ads to increase page speed and would appreciate your support instead via PayPal, Patreon, YouTube Membership or by using any of the affiliate links below. Have any other ideas of how to support? EMail.
MOZA RacingSim-LabFanatecTrakRacerAsetekInternet Privacy From NordVPNDreamhostCapital One Credit Card Application
HumbleFanaticalCDKeysAmazonAmazon UKiRacingGet your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks.Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42

About a year ago I posted about a threat to a number of sim racing developers where a patent filed in 2010 appeared to claim ownership of technology pioneered by multiple developers many years beforehand.

I have tweeted during the past year as each case was ultimately dropped, with just the iRacing case still being processed in the court system. Finally, thankfully, iRacing have now announced that their case is closed as well.

I didn’t believe the patent had any merit whatsoever in my original post and am thankful the court system saw that as well.

Text from their news post:

iRacing.com is pleased to announce that on September 20th, 2022, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts granted iRacing.com’s motion to dismiss the patent lawsuit filed against it by Integrated Technology Solutions, LLC (“ITS”), a patent assertion entity (Case No. 1:21-cv-11477). The Court held that all claims of ITS’s U.S. Patent No. 10,046,241 are invalid as patent ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101.

iRacing.com, represented by Gish PLLC, argued that the patent claims should be invalidated under § 101 because they claimed the abstract idea of a racing videogame that simulates track conditions on a vehicle’s performance rather than technology to implement the idea. The Court agreed, finding that the patent “does not extend beyond an abstract concept” and “does not specify how to perform the purported concepts.” The Court’s opinion is linked here.

ITS had additionally asserted the ‘241 Patent in lawsuits against 505 Games (Central District of California Case No. 2:21-v-07599) and Bandai Namco (Northern District of California Case No. 3:21-cv-07416). However, ITS dropped both lawsuits after iRacing challenged the validity of the ‘241 Patent.

“We are very excited with this result,” said iRacing President Anthony Gardner. “It is a big win for us, and by extension the whole industry, which has been working hard to create dynamic track racing surfaces for the racing game community for years and years. The opinion sends a clear message to patent trolls.”

Previous News

No replies yet

Loading new replies...

About RSC

Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners. Some links on this Web site pay RSC a commission or credit. Advertising does not equal endorsement.

Podcast

Podcast micJoin Jon Denton, Tim Wheatley and Simon Croft as they discuss sim racing and racing games past, present and future.